"

Chapter 4: Developing a Sequence of Learning in Middle Years Outdoor Education 

Josh Ambrosy and Sandy Allen-Craig

Learning Intentions

  • Describe the different components of a unit planner for outdoor education in the middle years.
  • Analyse how the Understanding by Design (UbD) framework can be applied to develop successful units of outdoor education.
  • Recommend how middle years units of outdoor education can help prepare students to study VCE Outdoor and Environmental Studies.

4.1 Introduction to Unit Planning

The planning of units of work is an essential skill to develop as a teacher. Through the development of units of work, you can design a specific sequence in which learning can take place, create and scaffold understanding across a period, and leverage outdoor experiences. Furthermore, the development of work units, rather than individual lesson planning, is a time-efficient process giving you additional time to be able to respond to the other pressures of the job. By having a detailed plan at the outset of a term or semester for your classes, you can be more intentional about teaching towards specific outcomes that you are trying to achieve within your outdoor education (OE) program.

This chapter argues for the importance of a backward design process known as Understanding by Design (UbD) (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005) when developing a curriculum for outdoor education in the middle years. Following this, we turn to the pragmatics of unit planning and offer suggestions to help you plan purposeful learning through these tools. We conclude by considering how middle years outdoor education electives can prepare students to undertake the VCE Outdoor and Environmental Studies course (see Chapters 8-12).

4.2 Understanding by Design and Outdoor Education

The UbD framework provides teachers with a specific process to help plan meaningful work units. Although this process wasn’t developed specifically for OE, it provides an excellent framework for planning units or courses.

Understanding by Design is a book written by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe that offers a framework for designing courses and content units called “Backward Design.”

In Understanding by Design, Wiggins and McTighe argue that backward design is focused primarily on student learning and understanding. When teachers are designing lessons, units, or courses, they often focus on the activities and instruction rather than the outputs of the instruction. Therefore, it can be stated that teachers often focus more on teaching rather than learning. This perspective can lead to the misconception that learning is the activity when, in fact, learning is derived from a careful consideration of the meaning of the activity.

The Three Stages of Backward Design

“Deliberate and focused instructional design requires us as teachers and curriculum writers to make an important shift in our thinking about the nature of our job. The shift involves thinking a great deal, first, about the specific learnings sought, and the evidence of such learnings, before thinking about what we, as the teacher, will do or provide in teaching and learning activities.”

 

Figure 2. Stages of UbD, by Josh Ambrosy, adapted from Brown (n.d),  Understanding by design https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/59/Understanding-by-Design.docx  CC BY

Stage One – Identify Desired Results

In the first stage, the teacher must consider the learning goals of the lesson, unit, or course. Wiggins and McTighe provide a useful process for establishing curricular priorities. They suggest that the teacher ask themselves the following three questions as they progressively focus in on the most valuable content:

    • What should participants hear, read, view, explore or otherwise encounter?
    • This knowledge is considered knowledge worth being familiar with. Information that fits within this question is the lowest priority content information that will be mentioned in the lesson, unit, or course.
    • What knowledge and skills should participants master?

The knowledge and skills at this substage are considered important to know and do. The information that fits within this question could be the facts, concepts, principles, processes, strategies, and methods students should know when they leave the course.

    • What are big ideas and important understandings participants should retain?

The big ideas and important understandings are referred to as enduring understandings because these are the ideas that teachers want students to remember sometime after they’ve completed the course.

Stage Two – Determine Acceptable Evidence:

The second stage of backward design has the teacher consider the assessments and performance tasks students will complete in order to demonstrate evidence of understanding and learning. In the previous stage, the teacher pinpointed the learning goals of the course. Therefore, they will have a clearer vision of what evidence students can provide to show they have achieved or have started to attain the goals of the course. Consider the following two questions at this stage:

    • How will I know if students have achieved the desired results?
    • What will I accept as evidence of student understanding and proficiency?

Stage Three – Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction:

The final stage of backward design is when teachers begin to consider how they will teach. This is when instructional strategies and learning activities should be created. With the learning goals and assessment methods established, the teacher will have a clearer vision of which strategies would work best to provide students with the resources and information necessary to attain the goals of the course.

Adapted from Brown (n.d),  Understanding by design.  https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/59/Understanding-by-Design.docx  CC BY

 

To summarise, the UbD framework flips, the planning process to start with the outcomes and finish with the learning. This is often the reverse to how many teachers might plan. Due to the administrative and other pressures of the job, in many schools, planning what is taught first is not uncommon. Although a UbD approach requires additional time at the start of a unit of work, that time can be recouped throughout the semester.

 

Activity 4.1 Backwards or Forwards Design.

Complete the following table, to help you think about the advantages and disadvantages of taking a UbD or backward approach to your planning for middle years outdoor education.

Advantages of UbD

Disadvantages of UbD

Other Observations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An editable copy of this activity can be accessed here: A Teachers Guide to Outdoor Education Curriculum Activity 4 1 (.docx)

4.2.1 Establishing Learning Outcomes

When beginning your planning, it’s essential to establish clear learning outcomes guided by the principles outlined in section 4.2. Start by developing your essential understandings with a focus on the specific outdoor environment you will be teaching in, the needs and characteristics of your students, and the overall objectives you aim to achieve with your program.

Once you have defined the direction for your unit, we recommend linking your outcomes to the relevant curriculum descriptions and achievement standards in the Victorian Curriculum F-10. This ensures that your program is aligned with the broader educational framework and that you are approaching your curriculum development holistically. After mapping your learning goals to the curriculum, you may need to refine them to ensure they align seamlessly, particularly with key terminology and concepts.

 

Activity 4.2 – Establishing Learning Outcomes

Imagine you are working in a school and developing a unit for all Year 7 students to complete during their pastoral period. The unit will run for 60 minutes once a week for four weeks, leading up to a four-day camp. The camp, organised by an external provider at a hard-top facility, will involve a range of activities including a surfing day, a visit to a local ecological education centre, and several on-site activities such as canoeing, high ropes, and initiative challenges. Additionally, students will participate in a one-night mini hike and sleep-out, designed as preparation for longer hikes in Years 8-9. The trip has already been booked by a previous teacher.

The Deputy Principal – Teaching and Learning, has requested that you develop a series of preparation activities, as last year many students were not adequately prepared for the camp. They have also asked you to consider the overall learning outcomes of the program.

Provide 1-2 responses for each of the following questions:

    • **What should participants hear, read, view, explore, or otherwise encounter?**
    • **What knowledge and skills should participants master?**
    • **What are the big ideas and important understandings that participants should retain?**

**Brainstorm** using a mind map to outline what the learning experience will look like, taking into account the above responses.

4.2.Determining Evidence of Learning

Evidence of learning is not a synonym for assessment tasks. Yet, assessment tasks are one way of capturing and identifying what has been learnt. Prior to thinking about the types of evidence of learning you might want to see in your assessment tasks, first consider what the evidence of learning itself needs to demonstrate. As teachers, there is often a tendency towards the pragmatic parts of the planning process. Identifying evidence of learning, prior to determining the assessment task can be a good way to focus on the outcomes you are wanting to see, rather than the completion of a task. The below case study (4.1) demonstrates this in action.

Once you have established the evidence of learning you would like to see, you should then determine the assessment tasks that you will assign students. We discuss in detail the ways you might use assessment tasks as part of your middle years outdoor education programs in Chapter 5. Assessment tasks can be broken down into three broad purposes:

    • Assessment for learning: occurs when teachers use inferences about student progress to inform their teaching (formative assessment)
    • Assessment as learning: occurs when students reflect on and monitor their progress to inform their future learning goals (formative assessment)
    • Assessment of learning: occurs when teachers use evidence of student learning to make judgements on student achievement against goals and standards (summative assessment).

(Department of Education and Training, 2021)

Case Study 4.1 – Planning with UbD

Indoor rock climbing by Bady Abbas on Unsplash

Background

A year 9 outdoor education class is completing a unit titled “Responsible Relationships in Outdoor Education”. The key focus of this unit is how students can become responsible for their own and others leaning during outdoor experiences, and how they can become responsible stewards of outdoor environments through examining how people use outdoor environments. As part of this, the teacher has decided to develop some outdoor experiences based around climbing. Through climbing, students must learn how to work together safely to succeed in the activities in groups. Further, as part of an outdoor experience to Dyuritte (Mount Arapiles), students will consider the ethics of climbing, including access to different rocks and how climbing as an activity might impact on outdoor environments and the continuous connection to Country of the Traditional Owners the Wotjobaluk, Jaadwa, Jadawadjali, Wergaia and Jupagulk peoples who have occupied the lands around Dyuritte for thousands of years before climbing became a outdoor activity.

Without UbD

If you were to think about this scenario without utilising the UbD approach, you would likely plan the learning activities, then the assessment tasks. This might result in a range of learning like:

    • A climbing gear introduction session at school
    • Local climbing sessions at the local climbing gym
    • Theory classes based on the Traditional Owners relationship with Country
    • The trip to Dyuritte

In turn an assessment task may include a reflective journal at the end of the unit of work based on what the students learnt in the unit.

Upon assessing these journals, it is likely that you might discover that the students spent more time focusing on the climbing itself, rather than their relationships with each other and Country. The learning tasks, although valid, may also seem somewhat fragmented for the students. Without a skilled and highly experienced teacher, building the interconnections between the learning about climbing and the ongoing relationship to Country may have not been recognised or understood.

With UbD

By taking a UbD approach, you would begin by thinking about the desired results of the unit. If you were to answer the UbD questions above designed to help you identify desired results you might respond as follows.

    • What should participants hear, read, view, explore or otherwise encounter?
    • Traditional Owners Relationship with Country
    • Wotjobaluk, Jaadwa, Jadawadjali, Wergaia and Jupagulk peoples Language and Custodianship for Country
    • Climbing and the impact of climbing on Country
    • Climbing as a way to build relationships with self and others
    • Ways of being responsible when climbing on Country
    • What knowledge and skills should participants master?
    • Working safely in teams to bely, climb, etc.
    • Respecting Country through actions (minimal impact)
    • Analysing Traditional Owners Relationship with Country
    • What are big ideas and important understandings participants should retain?
    • People and Country are inseparable, Country cares for People and People need to care for Country
    • Through undertaking respectful learning activities on Country, we can build relationships with self, others and the environment

Following this, you could then answer the questions about the desired results as follows.

How will I know if students have achieved the desired results?

    • Students demonstrate through actions during practical activities, discussions, and assessment tasks a respect for Country
    • Students approach climbing in a mature way, that supports themselves and their peers to take managed risks and learn from those risks

What will I accept as evidence of student understanding and proficiency?

    • Students document their experiences of the unit through photographs and videos. They then use either multi-media or a written narrative to present a story of their learning journey to answer the question: ‘What does it mean, to develop a respectful relationship with Country and peers?’

By taking this approach, we have shifted the focus of both the unit and the assessment task, whilst still providing a rigorous framework through which learning can take place.

4.3 Unit Planning and Sequencing Learning

The development of unit planners is a key skill for teachers. There are multiple benefits to planning via a unit planner rather than a sequence of individual lessons. These include:

  1. Scaffolding: Through the planning of a unit, you can develop a sequence of learning (4.3.1) that scaffolds students through a process of guided inquiry. This means that you can be strategic about how both constructs (what is taught) and skills (the cognitive application of what is taught) are scaffolded within the unit. For example, students might first describe different minimal-impact strategies that could be used on a bush walk, then, during and after the walk, evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies.
  2. Diversity of Practice: Students in the middle years respond to diverse teaching and assessment strategies. Through using a unit planner, you can map a diverse range of teaching strategies and assessment practices across a given number of weeks to help make your curriculum more relevant to middle years students.
  3. Teacher Workload: The development of unit planners helps to manage teacher workloads, which has been directly linked to teacher wellbeing. Through planning over a larger period, you can develop a better curriculum and become more efficient with your planning time and manage your workload.

4.3.1 A Sequence of Learning and e5 Model

The e5 Model (3.1.2) can be used to help structure units that you develop. Through doing so, the model will assist you in scaffolding learning across the unit and create opportunities for students to take an active role in their own learning during units of work.

Activity 4.3 Scaffolding with the e5 Model

Imagine you are planning a unit for year 10 students that examines how technology impacts on students’ relationships with outdoor environments. Key outdoor activities in your unit include geo-cashing, mountain biking and surfing.

  1. Review the e5 Model in 3.1.2
  2. Plan, using dot points, the types of learning activities that might be appropriate for the technology unit using the table below.

Engage

 

Explore

 

Explain

 

Elaborate

 

Evaluate

 

An editable copy of this activity can be accessed here: A Teachers Guide to Outdoor Education Curriculum Activity 4 3 (.docx)

4.3.2 Negotiated Curriculum

In the 1980’s Garath Boomer (Bron et al., 2016) and colleagues proposed a model of curriculum negotiation. This model is still highly relevant for teachers of middle years outdoor education today. Boomer’s negotiated curriculum is an educational approach focusing on collaboration between teachers and students in designing the learning experience. Rather than following a traditional top-down model where the teacher decides all aspects of the curriculum, this framework allows both parties to negotiate what will be studied, how it will be learned, and how progress will be assessed. It aims to make learning more student-centred by integrating students’ interests, needs, and experiences.

Key elements of Boomer’s negotiated curriculum include:

    • Shared decision-making: Teachers and students work together to determine the learning content, pace, and methods.
    • Student-centred learning: Students have a voice in shaping their educational experience, ensuring that the material is more relevant and engaging for them.
    • Flexibility: The curriculum is adaptable, allowing it to evolve based on students’ interests and needs, creating a dynamic learning environment.
    • Empowerment and engagement: By involving students in decisions, they become more motivated and take greater ownership of their learning.

Activity 4.4 Negotiated Outdoor Education Curriculum

Using the table below, complete the table to explain how you might embed each of Boomer’s key elements into your unit planning as a middle-year outdoor education teacher.

Key Element

Use

Shared decision-making

  • Students undertake a coastal trip, and during the trip, activities are decided on based on weather conditions and the group, not a pre-determined schedule
  • Following a series of local outdoor activities, students are going to undertake a project through which they investigate a local sustainability issue that is impacted by recreational activities. Students choose the issue and negotiate the focus and presentation of the project.

Student-centred learning

 

Flexibility

 

Empowerment and engagement

 

An editable copy of this activity can be accessed here: A Teachers Guide to Outdoor Education Curriculum Activity 4 4 (.docx)

4.3.3 Student Research Tasks

Student research tasks are common in middle years education. However, some teachers avoid this approach to learning, believing that students may not acquire the necessary knowledge or may become off-task during research time. This is often due to issues in the design of the task itself and the accompanying instruction. When designing student research tasks, the following elements should be considered:

    • Purpose and appropriateness: Student research tasks should be purpose-driven—for example, when there is a genuine topic to be investigated by the students. They should align with the intended learning outcomes of the lesson. Assigning all students to research the same case study is not an effective use of a research task, as answers can be easily shared among the group and a lack of interest can be the result. Instead, an appropriate research task might be based on a student’s or small group’s interest in a particular topic or problem, where they have been able to negotiate aspects of the task (see Section 4.3.2).
    • Scaffolding and teaching: For research tasks to be effective, they need to be scaffolded and broken down into achievable parts. Deciding on research questions or determining the types of sources to be used are components that should be embedded within the task. When developing research tasks over one or more lessons, teachers should consider how to break down the elements of the task and identify explicit skills (note-taking, analytical skills, communication skills, etc.) that may need to be taught.
    • Use of technology: Students will primarily use technology during these tasks. Teachers should ensure that the use of technology is taught in a safe and ethical manner, including the use of generative AI as part of the task. It is important to follow the school’s relevant policies. Further information about the use of technology in schools and developing digitally literate citizens can be found on the following websites:

4.3.4 Mapping Assessment Tasks

When developing a unit planner, it is essential to map assessment tasks that include assessment as, of, and for learning. This is particularly important for middle years outdoor education teachers for several reasons:

  1. Assessment drives effective teaching and learning practices: For example, if students are tasked with a project examining how outdoor activities can be made more inclusive for diverse user groups, you might plan your surfing or biking sessions differently to equip them with the necessary insights and experiences for the project.
  2. Engagement through varied assessment: By mapping assessment tasks (especially those used for learning) from the outset, you can enhance student engagement through a variety of smaller tasks that allow them to demonstrate their knowledge and skills in different ways, catering to diverse learning styles.
  3. Supporting skill development: By establishing formative assessment tasks throughout the unit, you can monitor student progress on particular skills, ensuring they are adequately prepared for a summative (assessment of learning) task at the end of the unit. This ongoing assessment provides valuable opportunities for feedback and skill development, fostering greater success in the final assessment.

4.3.5 Integrating Outdoor Experiences and Environments into Unit Planners

The use of outdoor experiences is pivotal to teaching outdoor education in the middle years. Chapter 5 will provide a detailed overview of the types of experiences you might incorporate. As direct experiences in outdoor environments are an integral part of the curriculum, it is important to plan these within your unit planner. Doing so ensures that these experiences contribute to a holistic approach to teaching, both inside and outside the classroom.

Moreover, by including outdoor experiences in your unit planner, you can align your school-based lessons with the outdoor environments in which you teach (see Section 2.2.3). A best practice approach is to align each middle year’s unit with a specific outdoor environment. This alignment allows you to tailor both theoretical and practical learning to the chosen environment, reinforcing the central ideas of your unit and ensuring a cohesive learning experience.

4.3.6 Pathways to VCE OES in Year 7-10 Outdoor Education Curriculum

Outdoor education in the middle years should present a curriculum that is developmentally appropriate for the age group being taught. While the middle years should be regarded as more than just preparation for VCE, there is increasing pressure in some schools for teachers to begin early preparation for senior studies, particularly in Years 9 and 10. Empirically, we have observed that this pressure often leads to attempts to bring VCE content forward and structure the middle years in ways similar to VCE teaching (see Chapters 8-12). We do not support this approach. Instead, the following strategies can be used to develop students’ skills and knowledge in the middle years, preparing them for VCE Outdoor and Environmental Studies (OES) in a manner that remains suitable for middle years learners:

  1. Develop key skills: As discussed in Section 8.4.2, key skills underpin the teaching of OES. Rather than replicating content from VCE in the middle years, you can teach distinct and age-appropriate concepts while still fostering the development of analytical skills that will benefit students in future studies
  2. Focus on hard skills: In VCE, students must complete a number of outdoor experiences aligned with the study design. If students have already developed basic hard skills such as navigation and campcraft in previous years, you can focus more on aligning your outdoor trips with VCE content.

Chapter 4 Summary

In chapter 4, we have focused on the development of unit planners in middle years outdoor education, emphasising the importance of using the Understanding by Design (UbD) framework. UbD encourages teachers to plan backward by first identifying desired learning outcomes, then determining acceptable evidence, and finally designing learning experiences. The chapter discusses how a well-structured unit planner can scaffold learning, enhance student engagement, and manage teacher workload. Additionally, it highlights the value of aligning outdoor experiences with theoretical learning and planning curriculum pathways that prepare students for VCE Outdoor and Environmental Studies without simply replicating senior-level content. The chapter also explores the benefits of integrating key skills, formative assessments, and negotiated curriculum to create a holistic and developmentally appropriate outdoor education experience.

 Reflection Questions

  • How can the Understanding by Design (UbD) framework help you create more meaningful and engaging outdoor education units for middle years students?
  • What strategies can you use to ensure that your outdoor education unit integrates both theoretical learning and outdoor experiences effectively?
  • In what ways can assessment tasks be designed to support student learning throughout a unit, rather than just measuring outcomes at the end?
  • How can you develop key skills in middle years outdoor education that will help students transition smoothly into VCE Outdoor and Environmental Studies without replicating senior-level content too early?

References

Bron, J., Bovill, C., & Veugelers, W. (2016). Curriculum negotiation: the relevance of Boomer’s approach to the curriculum as a process, integrating student voice and developing democratic citizenship. Curriculum Perspectives, 36(1), 15-27.

Department of Education and Training. (2021). Assessment. https://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/practice/Pages/assessment.aspx

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Pearson.