4 Assessments in Mental Health care
Learning Objectives
- Describe the biopsychosocial approach to mental health assessment and apply it to patient care.
- Explain the Mental State Examination (MSE) and its use in evaluating a patient’s cognitive, emotional, and behavioural functioning.
- Discuss risk assessments, identify dynamic and static risk factors, and evaluate protective factors to ensure patient safety.
- Identify effective communication skills necessary to build rapport, gather information, and provide feedback during mental health assessments.
- Reflect on your practice by considering how biopsychosocial, risk, and MSE assessments enhance patient outcomes.
Introduction
Assessing mental health is a foundational skill for healthcare professionals, essential for providing holistic and effective care. A thorough mental health assessment allows practitioners to identify issues, explore root causes, and develop appropriate, individualised treatment plans. This chapter introduces the biopsychosocial approach to assessment—a comprehensive method that integrates biological, psychological, and social factors to give a full picture of a patient’s condition. You will also learn how to conduct a Mental State Examination (MSE), a structured assessment of an individual’s psychological functioning, and the significance of risk assessment, including evaluating protective and risk factors. Finally, the role of communication skills in conducting these assessments will be highlighted, ensuring that practitioners can engage patients effectively and gather accurate information.
The Biopsychosocial Approach to Assessment
The biopsychosocial model is a crucial framework in mental health care, especially for healthcare professionals. It recognises the complex interplay between biological, psychological, and social factors that influence an individual’s well-being. Unlike traditional biomedical models that focus primarily on physical symptoms or specific diseases, the biopsychosocial approach enables a comprehensive evaluation, accounting for the physical, emotional, and social dimensions of a person’s life. By using this structured method, healthcare professionals can collect, analyse, and document information holistically, leading to more tailored and effective patient care (Lewis & Foley, 2020).
The biopsychosocial model is especially pertinent in mental health contexts, as psychological and social factors often play a significant role in the onset, development, and recovery of mental health conditions. For instance, the link between mental health issues like depression and chronic physical conditions such as cardiovascular diseases has been well documented, highlighting the importance of a holistic perspective in understanding patient health (Burns et al., 2019).
Elements of a Biopsychosocial Approach
To conduct a thorough assessment, it is essential to explore each of the key domains: biological, psychological, and social.
Biological Factors
Biological factors refer to physical and physiological health, genetic predispositions, and any medical conditions that may impact mental health. Conditions such as diabetes, chronic pain, or cardiovascular disease can significantly increase the risk of developing depression or anxiety (Ma et al., 2021).
Example: A patient with a family history of bipolar disorder and hypothyroidism may present with mood fluctuations, necessitating an exploration of both medical and genetic factors.
Psychological Factors
Psychological factors encompass a person’s emotional state, cognitive functioning, behaviours, history of mental illness, coping mechanisms, and substance use. Understanding these elements provides insight into a patient’s mental resilience and current stressors.
Example: For a patient with chronic anxiety, exploring their history of trauma and coping strategies can reveal important triggers and inform treatment planning.
Social Factors
Social factors include the patient’s living conditions, relationships, employment status, cultural background, and access to support systems. Social isolation, financial hardship, or cultural barriers can profoundly influence mental health.
Example: A patient who has recently lost their job and lacks social support may be at increased risk for depression, highlighting the need for targeted interventions that address these social determinants.
Key Questions for Biopsychosocial Assessment:
- Biological: “Are you currently taking any medications or undergoing treatment for a physical health condition?”
- Psychological: “Have you experienced any changes in your mood or thoughts recently? How do you manage stress?”
- Social: “What does your support network look like? Are you currently employed or facing financial pressures?”
Incorporating a Recovery-Oriented and Person-Centred Approach in Assessments
Integrating a person-centred and recovery-oriented approach is essential for effective mental health assessments. Rather than focusing solely on symptoms, these approaches encourage healthcare professionals to understand the patient’s full experience, including their personal goals, values, and strengths. By doing so, healthcare providers can create a care plan that aligns with the patient’s vision for recovery, rather than just addressing symptoms (McKay et al., 2021).
Involving patients in decision-making promotes autonomy, respects their preferences, and fosters a sense of collaboration. The recovery-oriented approach emphasizes the individual’s potential for growth, focusing on strengths and long-term goals rather than symptom management alone. This method empowers patients, fosters hope, and encourages them to actively participate in their care.
Incorporating the patient’s support network—family, friends, or carers—further enriches the assessment process. This approach not only provides social and environmental context but also helps to establish a strong support system, improving continuity of care (McCormack et al., 2020).
By combining the biopsychosocial model with person-centred and recovery-oriented principles, healthcare professionals can evaluate biological, psychological, and social factors in a way that accounts for the individual’s unique context. This holistic perspective shifts the focus from managing symptoms to supporting overall well-being and guiding the patient towards a meaningful life (Standfield & Shah, 2021).
In practice, this involves using open-ended questions, validating the patient’s experiences, and collaborating to identify recovery goals. Healthcare professionals should recognize that recovery is not just about reducing symptoms but about helping patients regain a sense of purpose, connection, and control. This ensures that the assessment process respects the individuality of the patient and addresses their comprehensive needs.
Before Approaching a Person for Assessment
Conducting a mental health assessment requires careful preparation and an understanding of the key principles that ensure patient safety, comfort, and trust. For healthcare professionals, developing these foundational skills is essential for building effective therapeutic relationships and obtaining accurate information.
This section outlines important pre-assessment considerations:
1. Establish Trust and Rapport
Building rapport is fundamental before initiating any assessment, especially in mental health. Research shows that individuals are more likely to share sensitive information when they feel respected, understood, and safe (DeAngelis, 2019). Approaching the person with empathy and a non-judgmental attitude is essential to creating a trusting environment. Techniques such as active listening and validation of the person’s feelings are crucial in establishing this foundation, ensuring that the person feels comfortable and valued throughout the process (Price, 2017).
Example Technique: Begin the conversation with open-ended questions like, “How have you been feeling lately?” or “What brings you here today?” These types of questions demonstrate interest in the person’s experience and set the tone for an open, collaborative interaction.
2. Cultural Safety and competency
Healthcare providers play a critical role in reducing health inequalities by conducting thorough health and mental health assessments that are culturally safe. This involves not just understanding different cultures but also reflecting on one’s own biases, privileges, and the power imbalances present in healthcare systems. Studies show that culturally competent care enhances patient trust, reduces misunderstandings, and leads to better clinical outcomes through personalised interventions (Cosgrove et al., 2021). To conduct effective assessments, providers need to actively question assumptions and focus on building trust, respect, and equitable care for every patient (Curtis et al., 2019).
Key Steps for Practitioners:
Prepare for the Assessment: Before meeting the patient, take time to reflect on any assumptions you may have about their cultural background. Consider how your own cultural values might influence your approach.
Engage with Respect: Begin the assessment by establishing rapport and using respectful, inclusive language. Ask open-ended questions that allow the patient to share their own perspective on their mental health and well-being.
Incorporate Cultural Sensitivity: During the assessment, actively seek to understand the patient’s cultural, spiritual, and social context.
For example:
-
- Ask about their cultural views on mental health and illness.
- Be open to alternative healing practices or support systems they may value.
Collaborate with Cultural Experts: When working with patients from cultural backgrounds unfamiliar to you, collaborate with cultural liaison officers, Indigenous health workers, or interpreters to ensure effective communication and understanding.
Use Culturally Adapted Tools: Select assessment tools, such as the Mental State Examination (MSE), that are appropriate for the patient’s cultural context. Modify questioning techniques to suit their language preferences and cultural norms.
Document Appropriately: Ensure that documentation reflects the patient’s cultural background and preferences without stereotyping or making assumptions. Highlight specific cultural considerations that influence their care plan.
Case in Practice: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities
In Australia, conducting culturally safe mental health assessments requires understanding the unique needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. These communities may conceptualise mental health and healing differently, often emphasising a holistic approach that includes connections to family, land, and spirituality (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2023). Engaging with Indigenous health workers and learning culturally appropriate care practices, such as yarning or storytelling, can help bridge gaps in understanding and improve care outcomes.
By focusing on practical strategies like these, healthcare providers can ensure their assessments respect cultural differences, build trust, and provide care that meets the unique needs of each patient. This approach fosters equitable and supportive healthcare environments for all (Cosgrove et al., 2021).
Practical Tip: Ask the person about their cultural background and preferences. Questions such as, “Are there any cultural or spiritual practices important to you that we should consider during your care?” can help align the assessment with the patient’s values.
3. Informed Consent
Obtaining informed consent is a legal and ethical obligation in mental health care. Ensuring that the person understands the purpose of the assessment, what it involves, and how their information will be used is crucial. Informed consent empowers the patient and fosters a sense of collaboration and transparency. According to the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2024), clear communication about these aspects helps to build trust and promotes patient autonomy.
Steps for Informed Consent:
- Explain the purpose of the assessment clearly and in simple terms.
- Discuss how the information will be kept confidential and secure.
- Ensure the patient understands they have the right to withdraw or refuse the assessment at any time.
4. Assess the Person’s Emotional State
Before starting the assessment, evaluate the person’s current emotional and mental state. If the person appears highly distressed, agitated, or in crisis, it may be necessary to stabilise them first before proceeding with a comprehensive evaluation. Research emphasises the importance of managing acute distress, as it can interfere with the accuracy of the assessment and may increase the person’s distress (Fiani, 2022).
Action Point: If the person is experiencing acute distress, consider using de-escalation techniques or grounding exercises to stabilise their emotional state before conducting the full assessment.
5. Environment and Timing
The environment and timing of the assessment play a crucial role in its effectiveness. Conduct the assessment in a private, quiet setting to ensure the person feels comfortable and confidentiality is maintained. Choosing the right time for an assessment—when the person is calm and not overwhelmed—maximises the chances of a successful and accurate evaluation.
Practical Tip: Schedule the assessment at a time when the person is most likely to be receptive and alert, avoiding times when they may be tired, hungry, or otherwise stressed.
6. Evaluate Physical and Mental Health Status
Before initiating the biopsychosocial assessment, it is important to screen for urgent physical or mental health issues that might need immediate attention. A person in severe pain, experiencing acute psychiatric symptoms, or exhibiting signs of distress may require stabilisation before further assessment. Healthcare professionals must prioritise these urgent concerns to ensure the person’s safety and comfort.
Example: If a person presents with symptoms of severe anxiety or panic, providing immediate calming interventions or a brief grounding technique may help stabilise the person enough to proceed with the assessment.
7. Respect the person’s Autonomy
Healthcare professionals must respect a person’s autonomy throughout the assessment process. This means acknowledging their right to decline or delay the assessment, ensuring that they feel in control of their care and well-being. By doing so, healthcare professionals demonstrate respect for the person’s dignity, reinforcing trust and collaboration (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2024).
Action Point: If a person expresses a desire to pause or postpone the assessment, offer reassurance that they have control over the process and explore alternative times or settings that might be more comfortable for them.
Comprehensive Mental Health Assessment
A comprehensive mental health assessment is essential for healthcare professionals in Australia to accurately diagnose, treat, and support individuals experiencing mental health concerns. Utilising a structured and holistic approach, such as the biopsychosocial model, allows practitioners to integrate biological, psychological, and social factors, resulting in a deeper understanding of the person’s overall well-being. This model ensures that all aspects of an individual’s health are considered, leading to personalised and effective care (Mayall et al., 2022).
1. Biographical Information
Biographical information provides a foundation for understanding the person’s background, identity, and context. It is vital to gather these details early in the assessment process to establish rapport and gain insight into factors that might influence the person’s mental health. Key elements include:
- Age, Gender, and Marital Status: Basic demographics help identify developmental and relational factors that may impact mental health.
- Cultural Background: Understanding cultural context is crucial for addressing cultural beliefs or barriers to care, particularly in Australia’s diverse society. It’s important for healthcare professionals to approach these conversations with cultural sensitivity to build trust (Oakes, 2023).
- Occupation and Education Level: Employment and education provide insights into the person’s socioeconomic status, daily stressors, and potential areas of achievement or difficulty.
- Living Situation: Information about who the person lives with and their social circumstances reveals potential support systems or stressors that may affect their mental health.
Example Questions:
- “Can you describe your living situation and who you live with?”
- “What does a typical day look like for you at work or home?”
2. Physical Health Assessment (Biological Domain)
Assessing physical health is critical to rule out underlying medical conditions that could influence or mimic mental health symptoms. Many physical conditions, such as thyroid disorders, cardiovascular diseases, or diabetes, can have a direct impact on an individual’s mental health and must be thoroughly evaluated (Mayall et al., 2022).
Key areas to explore:
- Medical History: Enquire about past and present medical conditions, surgeries, and treatments.
- Current Medications: Assess the impact of any medications on mood or cognition, as side effects can influence mental health.
- Substance Use: Alcohol and drug use can exacerbate or mimic mental health symptoms, making it essential to understand usage patterns.
- Family History: Genetic predispositions to mental health conditions should be considered in developing a treatment plan.
Example Questions:
- “Are you currently managing any chronic health conditions?”
- “What medications are you taking, and have you noticed any changes in your mood since starting them?”
3. Psychological Assessment (Psychological Domain)
The psychological domain focuses on the patient’s mental health history, current symptoms, and cognitive and emotional functioning. This aspect of the assessment is crucial for understanding how the patient is coping with their mental health issues.
Key components include:
- Mental Health History: Explore any previous diagnoses, treatments, or hospitalisations to understand the person’s mental health trajectory (Wand et al., 2020).
- Current Symptoms: Assess for symptoms such as depression, anxiety, psychosis, or other emotional disturbances.
- Cognitive Function: Evaluate the person’s memory, attention, and decision-making abilities to detect any cognitive impairments.
- Coping Mechanisms: Identify how the patient currently manages stress, including both adaptive and maladaptive strategies.
Example Questions:
- “Have you been diagnosed with a mental health condition before? If so, what kind of treatment have you received?”
- “How have you been feeling emotionally in the past few weeks?”
Conducting a Mental State Examination (MSE)
The Mental State Examination (MSE) is a critical tool used by healthcare professionals to assess a person’s cognitive, emotional, and psychological state in a structured and systematic manner. It is a cornerstone of mental health assessments, helping clinicians make accurate diagnoses, monitor a person’s progress, and formulate effective treatment plans. The MSE provides a detailed snapshot of a person’s mental functioning, allowing healthcare professionals to identify and differentiate between various psychiatric conditions, ensuring that appropriate interventions and referrals are made (Snyderman & Rovner, 2009).
Core Components of the MSE
Healthcare professionals must be proficient in evaluating the different domains of the MSE to gather comprehensive information that forms the basis for clinical decisions:
- Appearance and Behaviour:
- Professionals should observe the patient’s physical presentation, including grooming, hygiene, dress, and posture. Behavioural observations may include eye contact, agitation, or unusual movements (e.g., restlessness or catatonia). These observations can offer clues about conditions such as depression or psychosis (Fernando & Carter, 2016).
- Speech:
- Evaluating speech involves noting the rate, tone, volume, and fluency. For instance, slow speech might indicate depression, while rapid or pressured speech could suggest mania. It is essential for healthcare providers to recognise these variations to assess emotional and mental states accurately.
- Mood and Affect:
- Mood is the patient’s sustained emotional state, while affect is the observable expression of that mood. Discrepancies between mood and affect, such as a flat affect despite reports of feeling content, are clinically significant and require further exploration.
- Thought Processes:
- This domain examines the flow, coherence, and logic of the patient’s thoughts. Healthcare professionals need to assess whether the patient’s thoughts are goal-directed and organised or if they display disruptions like tangential thinking or flight of ideas. Recognising these patterns is crucial for identifying conditions such as schizophrenia or manic episodes (Mitchell & Atri, 2014).
- Thought Content:
- Professionals must explore the patient’s thought content to identify any delusions, obsessions, or suicidal ideations. Asking about passive and active suicidal thoughts, as well as plans or intentions, is essential for evaluating the risk and urgency of intervention.
- Perception:
- This component assesses for hallucinations (visual, auditory, tactile) or other perceptual disturbances. Healthcare providers should ask about experiences such as hearing voices or seeing things others do not, as these symptoms are common in psychosis and severe mood disorders.
- Cognition:
- Cognitive assessment involves evaluating orientation (to time, place, and person), memory, attention, and concentration. Healthcare professionals may use standardized screening tools like the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to assess cognitive impairment or decline. The MoCA has been shown to be particularly effective in identifying mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compared to the MMSE, and is especially useful in early detection of dementia (Ciesielska et al., 2016).
- Insight and Judgment:
- Insight involves assessing the patient’s understanding of their condition and its impact on their life. Judgment evaluates their decision-making ability and whether they can make safe and realistic choices. These domains help healthcare providers determine the patient’s capacity for managing their own care and making informed decisions.
Applying the MSE in Clinical Practice
Healthcare professionals must approach the MSE flexibly, adapting the level of detail based on the clinical context and the person’s presentation. In acute settings, a brief but targeted MSE may be necessary, while more stable situations allow for comprehensive evaluations. Incorporating standardised screening tools like the MMSE or MoCA can enhance consistency and objectivity, particularly when assessing cognitive disorders such as dementia or monitoring mental state changes over time (Fernando & Carter, 2016).
By mastering the MSE, healthcare professionals can ensure a thorough understanding of the person’s mental state, leading to accurate diagnoses and effective, individualised treatment plans. Proficiency in conducting and interpreting the MSE is essential for all healthcare professionals involved in mental health care, supporting their ability to provide high-quality, evidence-based services.
4. Social and Environmental Factors (Social Domain)
The social domain examines the patient’s broader social context, which includes support systems, stressors, and environmental influences. Social factors play a significant role in mental health, and understanding these can enhance the effectiveness of interventions (Wand et al., 2020).
Key areas to consider:
- Support Systems: Assess the quality and availability of the person’s support network, including family, friends, or carers
- Social Stressors: Identify stressors such as financial difficulties, housing instability, or relationship challenges that may worsen mental health symptoms (Mayall et al., 2022).
- Cultural and Environmental Factors: Assess how the person’s cultural background and environment influence their perception and experience of mental health care (Bretton Oakes, 2023).
Example Questions:
- “Who do you rely on for support when you face difficulties?”
- “Are there any significant stressors in your life, such as financial concerns or changes in your living situation?”
5. Identifying Triggers and Precipitating Factors
Identifying triggers and precipitating factors is essential for understanding the underlying causes of the patient’s mental health symptoms. These can include trauma, significant life changes, physical health conditions, or substance use. Understanding these elements enables healthcare professionals to tailor treatment plans effectively (Oakes, 2023).
Example Questions:
- “Have you experienced any major life changes recently that might be affecting how you’re feeling?”
- “Can you identify anything specific that seems to trigger your symptoms?”
6. Collaborative History
Collecting information from family members, carers, or significant others provides a more comprehensive view of the patient’s condition. The support system often plays a crucial role in both assessment and treatment. Collaborative history can highlight behavioural changes or symptoms that the patient may not fully recognise or articulate themselves (Mayall et al., 2022).
Example Questions for Family or Carers:
- “What changes have you noticed in their behaviour or mood?”
- “How do you support them at home, and what challenges do you encounter?”
7. Risk Assessment
A comprehensive risk assessment is critical in mental health evaluation, particularly for assessing the risk of harm to self or others. This includes evaluating suicidal ideation, self-harm, or aggressive behaviours. It is crucial to distinguish between passive thoughts and active planning, as the latter indicates a higher risk level (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2023).
Protective factors, such as strong family ties or community support, should also be assessed to provide a holistic view of the patient’s risk profile.
Example Questions:
- “Have you had any thoughts about harming yourself or others recently?”
- “What keeps you going when you face difficult times?”
Common Risk Factors for Suicide and Risk of Harm to Others
Common Risk Factors for Suicide
Several risk factors significantly contribute to suicide rates, particularly among vulnerable populations:
Mental Health Disorders: Depression, anxiety disorders, and bipolar disorder are primary risk factors, with the presence of t hese conditions elevating suicide risk, especially when accompanied by feelings of hopelessness. Substance use disorders further increase risk due to their impact on impulsivity and judgment (Kölves, Potts, & de Leo, 2015).
Previous Suicide Attempts: A history of suicide attempts is a strong predictor of future risk, emphasizing the need for ongoing monitoring and intervention for individuals with such histories (Kölves et al., 2015).
Family History of Suicide: Genetic predispositions and the impact of growing up in environments affected by suicide or mental illness are significant risk factors, influencing both genetic and behavioural pathways (Cheung et al., 2012).
Chronic Illness or Pain: Chronic health conditions, including terminal illnesses and chronic pain, increase suicide risk due to the physical and emotional challenges they pose.
Social Isolation: Living alone or lacking a strong social network exacerbates feelings of hopelessness, particularly in rural and remote areas where access to mental health services is limited (Cheung et al., 2012).
Trauma and Abuse: Histories of trauma, including physical and sexual abuse, significantly increase the risk of suicide. Ongoing trauma, such as domestic violence, also contributes to heightened vulnerability (Lee & Pridmore, 2014).
Significant Life Events: Events such as relationship breakdowns, financial difficulties, or job loss can be critical triggers, especially among those already at risk (Kölves et al., 2015).
Cultural and Social Factors: Indigenous populations and LGBTQI individuals are at higher risk due to the intersection of discrimination, stigma, and mental health challenges. Geographical disparities also exist, with higher suicide rates noted in remote and disadvantaged areas of Australia (Cheung et al., 2012).
Access to Means: The availability of lethal means (e.g., firearms) is a significant risk factor. Restricting access is a critical prevention strategy to reduce suicide rates (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021)
Protective Factors
Healthcare professionals must identify protective factors that mitigate suicide risk, such as:
- Strong social support networks
- Access to mental health services
- Effective coping mechanisms
- Problem-solving skills
- Connectedness to family, community, or a sense of purpose in life
Identifying both risk and protective factors enables healthcare professionals to create effective safety plans and interventions tailored to the patient’s needs.
Risk of Harm to Others
Understanding and Assessing Risk
Evaluating the risk of harm to others is an essential part of mental health care. Factors influencing this risk include:
- History of Violence or Aggression: A history of aggression is a strong predictor of future violence, especially in individuals with previous mental health crises or substance use issues (Cheung et al., 2012).
- Mental Health Conditions: Psychosis, severe mood disorders, or personality disorders can heighten the risk of aggression, particularly when paranoia or delusions are present (Kölves et al., 2015).
- Substance Use: Alcohol and drug use impair judgment, lower inhibitions, and exacerbate underlying mental health issues, increasing the risk of violent behaviour (Cheung et al., 2012).
- Environmental Triggers: High-stress environments, homelessness, or interpersonal conflicts may further increase aggression risk.
- Access to Weapons: Assessing whether the patient has access to weapons is critical, especially if there have been threats or indications of violence.
Preventive Strategies
- De-escalation Techniques: Healthcare professionals should be trained in these methods to manage aggressive situations effectively.
- Safety Planning: Collaborative planning with the patient helps identify triggers and strategies to seek help before escalation.
- Law Enforcement Involvement: Engaging law enforcement is sometimes necessary when there is imminent risk to ensure safety.
Regularly updating risk assessments and collaborating with multidisciplinary teams are crucial for managing risks effectively, ensuring the safety of both patients and the wider community.
Integrating the Biopsychosocial Model for Holistic Care
Using the biopsychosocial approach, healthcare professionals can conduct comprehensive assessments that go beyond symptoms to understand the full range of factors influencing a patient’s mental health. This holistic model aligns with contemporary mental health care practices in Australia, emphasizing recovery-oriented and strengths-based approaches (Wand et al., 2020). By integrating biological, psychological, and social factors, healthcare professionals can develop more individualised care plans, ensuring the person receives the most effective and supportive interventions tailored to their needs.
Extending Communication Skills to Documentation and Multidisciplinary Care
Effective communication extends beyond patient interaction to include thorough and precise documentation of the assessment process. Accurate documentation ensures clear communication among healthcare team members, facilitates effective planning, and promotes continuity of care (Papageorgiou et al., 2018). Comprehensive records play a critical role in patient safety by tracking progress, identifying potential risks, and informing future interventions.
Consistent and detailed documentation also supports legal and ethical obligations, allowing healthcare teams to maintain a high standard of care based on the patient’s evolving needs. By recording observations and patient interactions accurately, healthcare professionals contribute to the development of an integrated care plan that reflects a multidisciplinary approach, enhancing clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes (Rees et al., 2018).
Conclusion
Mental health assessments are complex and multifaceted, requiring healthcare professionals to integrate multiple tools and approaches. By mastering the biopsychosocial assessment, conducting a thorough Mental State Examination (MSE), and understanding the components of risk assessment, healthcare professionals can provide comprehensive and compassionate care. Effective communication skills are essential throughout this process, ensuring that the person feels heard, understood, and supported. Through continuous practice, reflection, and professional development, healthcare providers can make communication a cornerstone of effective mental health care, leading to early intervention and improved outcomes for the people in their care (Papageorgiou et al., 2018).
Activities
Case Study 1: John
John is a 45-year-old mechanic who has been feeling increasingly isolated and overwhelmed over the past few months. He has withdrawn from social events, feels chronically fatigued, and has difficulty getting out of bed each morning. His job performance has deteriorated, and he has been missing work frequently. John also reports sleep disturbances and admits to having occasional thoughts that life is not worth living. Despite these symptoms, he has no history of mental health treatment or chronic illness. During the assessment, John discloses that he has been drinking alcohol more frequently as a way to “numb the feelings” but does not recognise this as a significant problem.
Reflective Questions for Practice:
- Exploring John’s Biopsychosocial Factors:
- What specific questions would you ask to explore John’s biological, psychological, and social factors contributing to his current state?
- Conducting a Mental State Examination (MSE):
- Based on the information given, how would you assess John’s appearance, behaviour, mood, and thought content during the MSE?
- Approaching Suicide Risk Assessment:
- Considering that John has reported thoughts that life isn’t worth living, how would you approach conducting a risk assessment for suicide or self-harm?
- What protective factors would you look for in John’s case?
- Communication Techniques:
- What communication strategies would you use to build rapport and make John comfortable discussing sensitive topics like his alcohol use and feelings of hopelessness?
- How would you document your findings to ensure continuity of care?
Case Study 2: Daniel
Daniel, a 45-year-old male, visits your outpatient clinic for a routine mental health review. He has a history of major depression and anxiety, for which he has been on antidepressants for the past two years. Recently, he lost his job, causing financial strain. His wife left him six months ago, worsening his sense of worthlessness and hopelessness. Daniel admits to drinking alcohol more frequently as a coping mechanism and mentions having passive suicidal thoughts, stating, “Maybe everyone would be better off without me.” He denies having a specific plan but acknowledges these thoughts.
Reflective Questions for Practice:
- Identifying Risk Factors:
- What are the primary risk factors for suicide in Daniel’s case, and how would you prioritise these in your risk assessment?
- Incorporating Protective Factors:
- How would you incorporate protective factors into your assessment and care planning for Daniel?
- Are there any potential protective factors that you could help Daniel build upon?
- Biopsychosocial Assessment:
- In line with the biopsychosocial model, what specific questions would you ask Daniel regarding his mental, physical, and social health to gain a comprehensive understanding of his current state?
- Communication Techniques:
- Reflect on how your communication approach could influence Daniel’s willingness to share further details about his suicidal thoughts.
- What techniques would you use to create a trusting environment?
References:
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. (2024). Informed consent. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/partnering-consumers/informed-consent
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2023). Mental health services in Australia. Australian Government. https://www.aihw.gov.au
Oakes, BM. (2023). Ontological insecurity in the post-covid-19 fallout: Using existentialism as a method to develop a psychosocial understanding to a mental health crisis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 26(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10157-9
Burns, A., Dannecker, E., & Austin, M. (2019). Revisiting the biological perspective in the use of biopsychosocial assessments in social work. Journal of Human Behaviour in the Social Environment, 29(2), 77–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1500505
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Risk and protective factors. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/factors/index.html
Cheung, Y. T. D., Spittal, M., Pirkis, J., & Yip, P. S. F. (2012). Spatial analysis of suicide mortality in Australia: Investigation of metropolitan-rural-remote differentials of suicide risk across states/territories. Social Science & Medicine, 75(8), 1460-1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.008
Ciesielska, N., Szcześniak, D., Podhorecka, M., Mazur, E., Chabowski, M., & Mazurkiewicz, P. (2016). Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test better suited than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) detection among people aged over 60? Meta-analysis. Psychiatria Polska, 50(5), 1039–1052. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/45368
Cooper, A., Brown, J., Eccles, S., Cooper, N., & Albrecht, M. (2021). Is nursing and midwifery clinical documentation a burden? An empirical study of perception versus reality. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(11–12), 1645–1652. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15718
Cosgrove, L., Morrill, Z., Karter, J., Valdes, E., & Cheng, C. (2021). The cultural politics of mental illness: Toward a rights-based approach to global mental health. Community Mental Health Journal, 57(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-020-00720-6
Curtis, E., Jones, R., Tipene-Leach, D. et al. Why cultural safety rather than cultural competency is required to achieve health equity: a literature review and recommended definition. Int J Equity Health 18, 174 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1082-3
DeAngelis, T. (2019). Better relationships with patients lead to better outcomes. Monitor on Psychology, 50(10), 38. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2019/11/ce-corner-relationships
Fiani, T. (2022). Practical functional assessment and behavioral treatment of challenging behavior for clinically based outpatient services: A consecutive case series evaluation. Education & Treatment of Children, 45(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-022-00071-9
Fernando, A. I., & Carter, G. (2016). The Mental State Examination in clinical practice: A practical guide. Australasian Psychiatry, 24(4), 330–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856215598871
Hay, P., Wilton, K., Barker, J., Mortley, J., & Cumerlato, M. (2020). The importance of clinical documentation improvement for Australian hospitals. HIM-Interchange, 49(1), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358319854185
Kölves, K., Potts, B., & de Leo, D. (2015). Ten years of suicide mortality in Australia: Socio-economic and psychiatric factors in Queensland. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 37, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.09.012
Lee, A. Y. S., & Pridmore, S. (2014). Suicide and gender ratios in Tasmania (Australia) using the Operationalized Predicaments of Suicide tool, and negative experiences. Australasian Psychiatry, 22(2), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856214529354
Lewis, P., & Foley, D. (2020). Health assessment in nursing (3rd ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Ma, Y., Xiang, Q., Yan, C., Liao, H., & Wang, J. (2021). Relationship between chronic diseases and depression: The mediating effect of pain. BMC Psychiatry, 21, 436. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03428-3
Mayall, M., Teoh, Y., McDermott, B., Sadhu, R., & Bosanquet, M. (2022). Child and adolescent mental health multiaxial classification: A useful biopsychosocial framework for paediatrics? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 58(5), 822-829. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16026
McCormack, B., McCance, T., Bulley, C., Brown, D., McMillan, A., & Martin, S. (2020). Fundamentals of person-centred healthcare practice. Wiley Blackwell.
McKay, K., Ariss, J., & Rudnick, A. (2021). RAISe‐ing awareness: Person‐centred care in coercive mental health care environments—A scoping review and framework development. Journal of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing, 28(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12671
Mitchell, A. J., & Atri, A. (2014). The mental status examination: A core skill for practice. In Oxford Textbook of Geriatric Medicine (3rd ed., pp. 273-287). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780199928453.003.0019
Papageorgiou, A., Loke, Y. K., & Fromage, M. (2018). Communication skills training for mental health professionals working with people with severe mental illness. BJPsych Advances, 24(4), 220-220. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2018.18
Price, B. (2017). Developing patient rapport, trust, and therapeutic relationships. Nursing Standard, 31(50), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2017.e10909
Rees, C. S., Jones, M., & Richards, C. (2018). Understanding the importance of communication in healthcare. Nursing Times, 114(10), 36-39. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2018.e11104
Standfield, J., & Shah, N. (2021). Mental health recovery and transformation: Lessons for action. International Journal for Health Promotion and Education, 59(3), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2021.1905967
Snyderman, D., & Rovner, B. W. (2009). Mental status exam in primary care: A review. The American Journal of Medicine, 122(12), 1054–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.06.004
Wand, T., Buchanan-Hagen, S., Derrick, K., & Harris, M. (2020). Are current mental health assessment formats consistent with contemporary thinking and practice? International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 29(2), 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12656
