Chapter 3 wrap-up

You have now finished Chapter 3.

We ended this chapter with a focus on news consumption, and you heard from two students about their experiences of being a news consumer today.

What does our news consumption case study tell us about audiences more generally?

  • Audience practices are unique to the individual and embedded in everyday life
  • However, there are trends that can be observed – individuals share their practices, motivations, and experiences with other audience members
  • We should never make assumptions about audiences, what they do, why they do it, or how media effects them (more on this in Chapter 7!)
  • We can avoid making assumptions by collecting evidence about audiences – from reflecting on our own experiences to interviewing, surveying, or observing others.

In the next chapter, we’ll begin to consider how communicators make meaning – and engage their audiences – through signs and stories.

 

Chapter 3 References

ACMA – Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2022a). Communications and media in Australia series: How we communicate (Executive summary and key findings). CC BY 4.0.

ACMA – Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2022b). Communications and media in Australia series: How we watch and listen to content (Executive summary and key findings). CC BY 4.0.

Bailo, F., Meese, J. and Hurcombe, E. (2021). The institutional impacts of algorithmic distribution: Facebook and the Australian news media. Social Media + Society 7(2).

Baker, J. T. (1907). The Art of Conversation: 12 Golden Rules. Correct English Publishing Company.

Berelson, B. (1949). What “missing the newspaper” means. In P. F. Lazarfeld and F.N. Stanton (Eds.), Communications Research, 1948-1949, pp. 111-128. Harper and Brothers.

Bird, E. (2011). Seeking the audience for news: response, news talk, and everyday practices. In Nightingale, V (ed), The Handbook of Media Audiences, pp. 489–508. Blackwell.

boyd, d. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press. CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. Peter Lang.

Costera Meijer, I. (2020). Understanding the audience turn in journalism: from quality discourse to innovation discourse as anchoring practices 1995–2020. Journalism Studies, 21(16), 2326-2342.

Georgiou, M. (2017). Identity. In Ouellette, L. and Gray, J. (eds), Keywords for Media Studies, New York University Press: 94–98.

Hall, S. (1973/2019). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. In Morley, D (ed.), Stuart Hall: Essential Essays Volume 1. Duke University Press.

Hartley, J. (2004). Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: The Key Concepts, 3rd Edition. Routledge.

Lee, F. et al. (2019). Consumptive news feed curation on social media as proactive personalization: A study of six East Asian markets. Journalism Studies 5, 1–16.

Livingstone, S. (2018). Audiences in an age of datafication: critical questions for media research. Television & New Media 20(2), 170–183.

Lu, S. (2020). Taming the news feed on Facebook: Understanding consumptive news feed curation through a social cognitive perspective. Digital Journalism 8(9), 1163–1180.

McQuail, D. (1997). Audience Analysis. Sage.

Meese, J. and Hurcombe, E. 2020. Facebook, news media and platform dependency: The institutional impacts of news distribution on social platform. New Media & Society 23(8).

Merten, L. (2020). Block, hide or follow—personal news curation practices on social media. Digital Journalism 9(8), 1018–1039.

Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience evolution: new technologies and the transformation of media audiences. Columbia University Press.

Park, C. and Kaye, B. (2019). Mediating roles of news curation and news elaboration in the relationship between social media use for news and political knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 63(3): 455–473.

Regional TAM, OzTAM, and Nielsen. (2016). Australian Multi-Screen Report Quarter 1.

Rosen, J. (2006. The people formerly known as the audience. PressThink. http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html

Shaw, A. (2017). Encoding and decoding affordances: Stuart Hall and interactive media technologies. media, culture & society 39(4), 592-602.

Tang, S., Willnat, L., and Zhang, H. (2021). Fake news, information overload, and the third-person effect in China. Global Media and China6(4), 492-507.

Thorson, K et.al. (2019). Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society 24(2), 1–18.

Wallisch, P. (2017). Illumination assumptions account for individual differences in the perceptual interpretation of a profoundly ambiguous stimulus in the color domain: ‘‘The dress’’. Journal of Vision, 17(4), 1–14. CC BY 4.0.

Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology30(1), 75-89.

Licence

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Communication Concepts Copyright © by Deakin University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book