3. How did CLE come about and what do clinics do that is relevant to the climate?
CLE in Australia began in the early 1970s alongside and in conjunction with the nascent community legal centre (‘CLC’) movement. Australian CLE and CLCs had a common focus on social justice and providing legal help for economically and socially disadvantaged individuals who were unable to access regular paid legal services.[1] Many CLE programs in Australia were started by volunteer law students inspired by the politics of social change and social justice. Similar forces were at work in other jurisdictions. While each jurisdiction has its own history, the 1960s and early 1970s saw clinical programs established in at law schools in the United States of America, Canada and the United Kingdom. Clinical programs are now found in law schools worldwide.
In Australia, early clinical programs provided general legal support and focused on assisting individual clients, usually low-income or disadvantaged.[2] Specialist clinics that focused on a particular subject matter, area of law or category of client emerged in the 1990s.[3] Since then the concept of the ‘client’ as well as the nature of the work done by students in clinic has expanded. For instance, clinics now:
- offer advice and transactional work for organisations and enterprises;
- undertake research, advocacy and policy development for social movements or even for the environment as client;[4]
- do community legal education, law reform and capacity building where the client is the community.
Two elements provide a common link for clinics across time: the real nature of the work and the ongoing commitment, particularly in the Australian context, to social justice and the public interest.[5]
The term ‘climate justice’ recognises that structural and socio-economic inequalities, and intergenerational inequity, impact individuals’ and communities’ experience of climate change, and advocates for equitable solutions that prioritise the needs of those who most affected.[6] Given the existential threat posed by a changing climate — to the environment and humanity — and the recognition that the impacts of a changing climate are not borne equally, a climate clinic falls squarely within this framework.[7]
In addition to the wide ambit of the ‘work’ and ‘clients’ of a clinic there are a range of approaches or models for CLE, ranging from in-house generalist or specialist clinics based at law schools in which students are supervised by law school academic staff practitioners, to externship models in which students undertake placements and are supervised by lawyers in CLCs, private firms or government. These different ways of doing CLE will be discussed in more detail later in the chapter in the context of different models for climate clinics.
KEY QUESTIONS
- Conduct some quick research on a CLC near where you live. Have a look at their website to identify their purpose, the communities they support and the types of legal work they undertake. How do they act in the public interest?
- Think about the kinds of work that clinics in Australia do (transactional work, research work, and legal education and reform work). Who might be a client of a climate clinic, and why?
- Frank S Bloch and Mary Anne Noone, ‘Legal Aid Origins of Clinical Legal Education’ in Frank S Bloch (ed), The Global Clinical Movement: Educating Lawyers for Social Justice (Oxford University Press, 2010) 153, 156. ↵
- Jeff Giddings, ‘Clinical Legal Education in Australia: A Historical Perspective’ (2003) 3 International Journal of Clinical Legal Education 7, 7–13. ↵
- Ibid 11, 20. ↵
- A conception of the client highly relevant for the current discussion is the idea of the Earth itself as client. This idea will be explored further in the following sections in the discussion of the mission of a climate clinic. See, eg, Client Earth (Web Page) <https://www.clientearth.org/>; Australian Earth Laws Alliance (Web Page) <https://www.earthlaws.org.au/>. ↵
- Adrian Evans et al, Australian Clinical Legal Education: Designing and Operating a Best Practice Clinical Program in an Australian Law School (ANU Press, 2017). ↵
- See, eg, ‘Climate Change is a Matter of Justice — Here’s Why’, United Nations Development Programme (Blog Post, 30 June 2023) <https://climatepromise.undp.org/news-and-stories/climate-change-matter-justice-heres-why>; ‘Climate Justice’, United Nations (Blog Post, 31 May 2019) <https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2019/05/climate-justice/>. ↵
- See, eg, discussion in Adrian Evans, ‘Greenprint for a Climate Justice Clinic: Law Schools’ Most Significant Access to Justice Challenge’ (2018) 25(3) International Journal of Clinical Legal Education 7. ↵
The community legal centre (‘CLC’) movement began in the early 1970s, driven by students, academics, young workers and lawyers. Currently, there are approximately 200 CLCs across Australia. They provide free and independent legal support to people experiencing hardships but unable to access regular paid legal services due to socioeconomic disadvantage. Their services span across civil, family and criminal law. In addition to providing legal services, CLCs also participate in community legal education, law reform and advocacy to mobilise change and support the community in a holistic way.
There are many definitions of climate justice. The definition by the Climate Justice Global Alliance states that ‘climate justice advocates for equitable solutions that prioritize the needs of those who are most affected by climate change, strive to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and ensure that the burdens and benefits of climate action are distributed fairly, taking into account historical and systemic inequalities.’ Climate justice has various aspects:
- Distributive justice: paying attention to inequalities in the causes, burdens of addressing and experience of impacts.
- Procedural justice: ensuring participatory, accessible, fair and inclusive processes to address climate change.
- Recognition justice: centring voices of those who have historically been marginalised, such as First Nations in Australia.
- Reparative or corrective justice: considering what actions are necessary to redress and repair harms caused