"

3. Conclusion

This chapter stresses the importance of actively consulting and meaningfully listening to First Nations peoples on matters relating to climate change. The cultural imperative for First Nations communities in Australia has always been, and will always be, to care for Country. This chapter argues that there is a need for a variety of mechanisms for asserting the rights of First Nations peoples to Country. The range of mechanisms includes land rights, native title, environmental approval regimes and cultural heritage laws. There is no clear-cut pathway within the settler-colonial legal system which will suffice to advance the interests of First Nations peoples and their relational, custodial obligations to Country; instead, a variety of different mechanisms will need to be activated by First Nations peoples. Where it exists in Australia, human rights legislation can provide another mechanism for asserting the rights of First Nations people to Country.[1] However, human rights are anthropocentric, and part of the problem is that Country is not centred within the coloniser’s legislative and common law frameworks, while humans are. Therefore, the various human rights Acts can only ever be part of the response to First Nations issues, and the system has inherent limitations. In this context, it is interesting to record recent jurisprudence in Aotearoa New Zealand, where the Whanganui River was recognised to have legal standing.[2] Expansion of legal standing to non-human entities could be the first step in a worldwide recognition that environmental concerns and First Nations conceptions of relationality as extending beyond humanity can and must be prioritised.

On-Country knowledge from traditional First Nations custodians must form part of any transformative response to the current climate crisis by climate conscious lawyers. In such contexts, it is essential that climate conscious lawyers possess cultural awareness and humility and do not inadvertently appropriate First Nations cultural knowledge or seek to advocate on behalf of First Nations peoples by taking up the space that should be given over to First Nations voices.

We argue that becoming a climate conscious lawyer is not possible without the purposive inclusion of First Nations knowledges and perspectives, and the movement must be part of the process of decolonising both legal education and the settler-colonial Australian legal system. Students, academics and practitioners must ensure that First Nations knowledges are centred and not appropriated.

This chapter has invited you to consider the impact of Australia’s colonial history on First Nations peoples and Country. Now being more aware of the injustices and the ongoing impacts, you should have greater appreciation for why climate conscious lawyers need to engage with First Nations knowledges in any matter where Country is potentially being impacted. It is essential that local First Nations voices, particularly those with a strong connection to specific Country, are included to strengthen the broader arguments being made about the climate change impacts of proposed developments. This is crystallised in the phrase:

Listen to us! Care for Country!


  1. For example, Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld), Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic), Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT).
  2. Miriama Cribb, Elizabeth Macpherson and Axel Borchgrevink, ‘Beyond Legal Personhood for the Whanganui River: Collaboration and Pluralism in Implementing the Te Awa Tupua Act (2024) International Journal of Human Rights 1.
definition

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Becoming a Climate Conscious Lawyer Copyright © 2024 by La Trobe University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.